October 12, 2000 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Terence L. Day - 509/335-2806 (office)
509/334-1619 (Home)
WSU Faculty Not Gloomy About Future of Agriculture
PULLMAN, Wash. -- Reaction of agricultural
economists to Steve Blank's prediction of the end of American
agriculture ranged from "dangerous" to acknowledging
some benefit in its shock value.
Blank, author of the book, "The End of Agriculture in the
American Portfolio," is a financial and risk management
economist at the University of California, Davis. He spoke here
Wednesday afternoon and Thursday morning at the Washington State
University Cooperative Extension Conference 2000.
Thomas Schotzko, a WSU market economist who specializes in apples
and potatoes, kicked off a panel response to Blank's lecture
by saying, "I do not agree with him."
A. Desmond O'Rourke, recently retired director of the WSU IMPACT
Center and an authority on international marketing, acknowledged
the book's shock value to bring attention to real dangers in
agriculture, but also found danger in the book.
Larry Makus, a University of Idaho agricultural economist, said
it's dangerous to extrapolate historic trends 50 to 100 years
into the future, as Blank does.
Makus agreed with Blank that traditional
investment theory says assets flow to higher rates of return,
but questions that the theory applies in agriculture. Blank says
economists can't explain why farmers remain in the business despite
low rates of return on their investments.
Blank's theory is that low profits in agriculture cause farmers
to eventually sell out and invest their assets in higher-paying
non-agricultural activities. He predicts that America will wind
up relying on foreign nations for food, unless public policy
provides subsidies to help American farmers stay in business.
Agricultural economists at the Palouse universities said American
agriculture has changed a great deal and will continue to change,
but will continue to be an important part of the nation's economy.
Schotzko said both the apple and potato industries are starting
to change market strategies, but that it is old thinking, not
apple and potato production, that will disappear.
The economist said companies like Wal-Mart and Costco are changing
the way apples are marketed, and that Washington orchardists
can profit from the new way of selling to consumers.
The new way involves lots of opportunities for growers who are
willing to enter into new kinds of contracts and produce what
retailers want and are willing to pay for, Schotzko said.
O'Rourke, who was schooled in classical
history, chided Blank for a short-sighted view of history. Blank's
data goes back 50 years. O'Rourke's historical perspective covers
3,000.
Although agriculture is becoming more global, O'Rourke said local
factors remain "a huge factor," and that farmers can
take advantage of local factors.
He cited wheat production in the Palouse, which offers nearly
ideal growing conditions. "I don't see a demise in Palouse
wheat production," O'Rourke said. He also noted that Washington
apple growers are feared by competitors around the world.
Fresh from a trip to Asia, O'Rourke said an Australian farmer
who grows salad vegetables in China said he can't compete with
large-scale California growers, who sell their vegetables all
over the world.
"The demise of U.S. agriculture is not something that is
very near at hand," O'Rourke concluded.
"No matter whether you are talking about potato chips or
micro chips, you see the same overproduction" that Blank
talked about in his lecture. O'Rourke said they are just normal
cycles.
But O'Rourke warns American farmers that they don't "own"
markets for their products. Markets are only "on loan,"
and farmers have to continually compete to sell in them.
Makus questioned Blank's assertion that
America is moving towards more reliance on food produced overseas.
He said his analysis of data shows that foreign trade in food
has increased, but we are both buying more and selling more in
international trade.
In response, Blank defended his analysis, saying that only 1.3
percent of Americans are employed in agricultural production.
That's one of the lowest rates in the world.
"This is an economic indication that agriculture is an inferior
good," Blank said. Although the agricultural life style
is valued, other investments have a higher value and assets are
moving out of agriculture, he maintained.
He said the data show that the best way to stay in agriculture
is to diversify out of agriculture. In other words, to take off-farm
employment or invest in non-agricultural ventures that will produce
money that allows the family to remain on the farm.
Blank said the world's largest strawberry grower is leaving agriculture,
not because he wasn't making a profit, but because he could make
a much bigger profit by selling out and investing his money somewhere
else.
James Zuiches, dean of the WSU College of Agriculture and Home
Economics, credited Blank with doing "an extraordinary job
of pointing out a problem," and that recognition of the
problem is the first step towards resolution.
- 30 -
WSU employment and programs are available to all without discrimination.
Heading using the h3tag
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.